The invoice is extraordinarily broad and obscure in its rhetoric and principally says that it bans “dialogue” or “instruction” pertaining to sexual choice or gender id. Florida Conservatives are saying the invoice is a ban on Ok-3 intercourse ed or ‘indoctrination’ (regardless of the hell which means) but when it had been pertaining simply to intercourse ed then it will explicitly say that and have a extra slim definition of what could be allowed.
Proper now the language is deliberately obscure so academics are uncertain of what may very well be included or grounds for them to be sued or fired. It may very well be so simple as a scholar mentioning their two dads and one other asking about that. There are kids’s books that depict LGBTQ household models. There are tons of contexts that don’t have anything to do with intercourse the place LGBTQ individuals could come up as a result of there are tons of conditions the place heterosexual or cisgendered individuals come up. They exist. They’re round. And typically children have questions. It’s very regular.
What that is actually about is political theatre designed to drum up nasty publicized lawsuits with tons of appeals so Republicans can rally probably the most extremist elements of their bases throughout elections. Vote Republican or the socialist liberals with indoctrinate your kids with the gay agenda! All that rot. It’s a canine whistle for one thing that is not even an actual factor or a problem, similar to CRT is not even being taught in k-12 colleges however they’re performing like it’s. It is also a chance for them to remind marginalized individuals how unwelcome they’re even in 2022.
